5 manual RCM then queued up one track at a time. I don't know which is more truthful. ”. I can't believe there's any real debate over MFSL SACD vs. A good vinyl record (that is scratch free, been cleaned on a vacume based record cleaner) sounds better then a CD, with again broader, deeper sound field, smoother over all audio, etc. There isn't an answer as to what sounds better it really is just personal preference. Analog sources- CD vs. However, I have tested the EQ of my cartridge and phono stage and in all the following examples, that EQ has been reversed out of the vinyl samples so that what we're comparing is the true EQ of what's in the LP groove. Not a fair comparison. Sony SACD. 3. 112 posts total. Midrange is sweet. The choice between the two depends on personal preferences and the desired. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. Smoother, more open, and slightly fuller than redbook, without the added distortion of vinyl or the oddness in the upper registers heard on SACD. Seems like for PG3 one should definitely get Classic Records Vinyl, for PG1 SACD gets closer to vinyl, but still the vinyl has upper hand. Maybe but so far my experience with mofi's SACD vs vinyl has not been good for SACS. 10/disc royalty for CDs. All great stuff and this combined with the revitalized vinyl market bodes well for my enjoyment of music at home and is a much brighter picture than I saw when the future of audio seemed only CD and compressed. One is the MFSL version which I loved. SACD vs Vinyl Read More » 3) S/T Dire Straits - sounded good, but a bit underwhelming. It is a high-resolution digital. It's great for archiving, in it's day. On September 16th Analogue Productions announced they will reissue the entire ABC/MCA Records Steely Dan catalog on SACD, and 45rpm UHQR LP, beginning November 4th with their debut album Can't Buy A Thrill, now in its 50th anniversary year. I did a similar shoot out to yours above with the sax and vocal section at the end of Avalon with the SACD and UK first press vinyl. vinyl, I don't have vinyl so can't really tell. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Most are remasters of jazz, blues, classical or classic rock/pop titles. Moody Blues "Question of bal. 8224 MHz. 1k Posted October 24, 2003 The XRCD probably had a goosed up high end and somebody was fooled into preferring it. Most noticeable is a good front-to-back soundstage and to a lesser extent better timbre. : AREP 517787. Please, bear in mind that I have NO original vinyls to compare to, only the early CDs of Shake It Up and Greatest Hits: 1) Shake It Up - the worse pressing from the three. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Mastered: Doug Sax, James Guthrie, Joel Plante. . Endymion, Apr 22, 2015. I have most of the recordings you mention and they're all great. Note the. Along with LPs, SACDs, reel-to-reel tape and other forms of high-quality audio. 1kHz/16-bit digital audio is indistinguishable from high-resolution digital. Every time. 1/96/192 has little audible effect, ever hear a 20k test tone? The whole resolution. g. I do have two different versions of "Question of Balance". It is probably a more accurate rendition of the master tape but with my turntable and on. Also my opinion only. kevintomb Forum Resident. Many audiophiles choose to embrace both formats, recognizing that each. SACD vs. An XRCD is just a redbook CD that goes through a special mastering process, usually at 20 or 24 bit, as apposed to a standard redbook CD that is mastered at 16 bits (the XRCD's are converted down to 16 bit at the end of the mastering process in order to retain compatibility with redbook standard). Packaging: Nicest packaging and faithful reproduction of the original album. The Royal Scam features more prominent guitar work than the prior Steely Dan album, Katy Lied, which had been the first without founding guitarist Jeff Baxter. Then I bought the new SACD version. Well, I've been thinking of getting into vinyl for a while now but still haven't done it. For Up, SACD is the one to get. Likewise whichever has the edge in your playback system will be superior to the. DSD recordings have a wonderful sampling rate and are sensationally good. " For classical I prefer SACD due to the format's running time though. Worse yet, the voices felt 'simplified' somehow, almost boring. At current SACD and vinyl reissue prices I sure do. Again, though, the Blu-Spec CD sounded better than the regular CD - just a bit more fuller, more definition and tighter bass and treble extension over the CD. More sharing options. . I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. Ironically, the royalty for an SACD was the same as for a CD: $. Instrumental and vocal decay became more and more discernible and authentic. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. If the system is highly resolving there is a considerable and sometimes overwhelming difference. Vinyl. Sex Lies And Master Tapes, Sep 16, 2022. There are very few times I like the CD better than the LP. This is especially appealing for home theater enthusiasts. onlyconnect, Sep 19, 2020. Once you listen to the unbelievable sound of the grandfather clock chiming you. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. 0:39 - Stereo SACD Layer3. Like the DVD, SACD was a dual-layer format, but instead of one or two high-density layers, the SACD could have a high-density layer and a CD-compatible layer, so the. Location: Finland. Vinyl can sound utterly amazing at first but eventually you will wear out a record. I do have an unwrapped Cramberries (best of) SHM CD with me. Claus , Feb 11, 2015 So, my completely subjective vote will go for DVD-A (or SACD). . Often times, the. I've noticed a surfeit in the cost and availability of SACD's - prices are really cheap for some top notch music, often recorded in Europe with the cost for many disks below $12- with shipping no less! I'm in the process of digitizing my vinyl along with ripping hundreds of CD's to my Mac, but I also like playing. Animals is a concept album, focusing on the social-political conditions of mid-1970s Britain, and was a change from the style of the band's earlier work. The LP may sound more natural and "warm". On the one hand, Norah Jone's 2012 Come Away with Me SACD has better overall sound quality (dynamic range, detail, etc. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. . View entire discussion. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. After purchasing The Cars S/T, Candy-O, and Shake It Up on MFSL vinyl, here are my thoughts. Like a garage/ alley band. Boy, what a difference. BD Pure Audio is basically the same as DVD-A except it's encoded to 96/24. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. Dec 10, 2005. However, play the SACD mono mix (or Sundazed mono vinyl-whatever you've got) on a half decent stereo system today and all the heavy compression, notch EQ-ing, and tricks he had to pull are exposed: the vocals are generally cranked up, that tambourine is really loud, and Crosby's rhythm guitar is generally buried in the mix. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. I have to disagree with the positive remarks of the SACD's. The standard CD format is a 2-channel, 16-bit, 44. When it comes to listening to music, there are two main formats that audiophiles swear by: SACD players and vinyl. SACD vs. I don't know which is more truthful. I’m interested to hear the opinion of those who regularly play LPs as well as their digital front-ends. New Jersey, USA. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. . SACD vs. Also, I believe Testikoff mentioned that the Shm transfer came from a master tape made for vinyl, which is not a good thing IMO. I sampled a bunch of SACDs and kept finding differences that were attributable to different mastering. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. Analog sources- CD vs. It's very difficult to set up a direct A/B comparison between SACD and CD. Third - Single side Japanese SACD . Multi-Channel Audio: SACDs often feature multi-channel audio, allowing for surround sound experiences. SACD vs. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. I grew up in the analogue days (vinyl and tape) so tape hiss is to be expected on recordings. This setup would be more flexible and cheaper overall. The MFSL SACD I could tell immediately that it didn't hold a candle to the MFSL 2-45 issue, or I think even the MOV mono pressing. What i meant was,as a whole,sacd recordings are good wheres dvd-audio recordings are a hit-and-miss. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. All titles are mastered from the original analog tapes by Bernie. . I only have a single SHM-SACD - it’s superior compared to every format I’ve heard the title on, including the MoFI SACD. Recent MoFi controversy spurred me to compare sound of MoFi Vinyl to CD, SACD to CD, DSD to FLAC. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. Just trust your ears, as I do mine. deeper, wider sound field. On LPs, it’s 30 dB at best. Acoustic Sounds Audiophile Vinyl Records. 1. I can go on, but you get the point. So - the SACD ain't the original, but it's a much better option than anything on vinyl except the MoFi vinyl issue. Bach's St Matthew's Passion. Page 7 of 10 < Prev 1. Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by rpd, Dec 11, 2003. . Certainly better than 3 or 4 other vinyl versions I have owned over the years. See moreSACD obviously has an advantage on portability and probably overall SQ - but that's still subjective as I might enjoy the "colorization" of vinyl more. DACs sound different because different DACs apply different filters to the input data and have different methods of producing the analogue signal, even if every DAC used the same chip each DAC's analogue output stage is different. the interesting part for me was the number of copies for this set. 49. Even on masterings I'm not all that happy with, the deep soundstage is there. Search first posts only. Vinyl. SACD is a very nice addition if you maintain a decent stationary rig anyway. CD. 10/disc royalty for CDs. 1 setup. CCR SACD vs new vinyl. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. Sure it has a tint, but what doesn't? Vinyl has a tint. While vinyl records, in theory, directly encode a smooth audio wave, CDs sample that audio wave at various points and then collate those samples. A masterpiece SACD set. SACD has given me some great listening moments. 1:55 - Rotel RC-1570 DAC-In questo video. In. Vinyl. I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. After that, what format is it available in? And which represents the best mastering? It's as simple as that. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Also, instead of a 16-bit depth, it uses a 1-bit depth. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. of the Dark Side of the Moon, is NOT good sonically. Maybe no better overall than any other version. . Quick links. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. . I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. SACD vs VINYL. SACD can get really close to how good vinyl can sound but not deteriorate so for me SACD wins. The data is read by a laser, and then decoded to produce audio playback. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Data read from an SHM CD is no different to the data red from an ordinary CD. • UHQR Vinyl Record. That old mix was reissued on SACD by Audio Fidelity in 2015, and then it was issued again on Blu-Ray by Rhino in 2017. Forums. The dynamics of the attack are still there, but the leading edge lacks aggressiveness and sounds much smoother. 10/disc royalty for CDs. The only significant differences are in noise. 4) Making Movies - muted, no drum slam, muted highs. I bought 2 each ten years ago or so. I run through a comparison review about this subject today. Limited Edition Numbered SACD CMOB 2260 SA $29. SACD vs. vinyl superior to both? thats been conjectured. The Analogue Productions SACD of Pink Floyd ‘s The Dark Side of the Moon is finally shipping after a long wait. For 11 years, I’ve enjoyed a Puccini + U-clock to spin CDs and (especially) SACDs. 98. Quote: Originally Posted by memepool Isn't it odd then that their full sized machines like the Sony BDP-S1 support a Matsu****a format like DVD but won't play legacy Sony format's like SACD or even redbook. Audiogon The world's largest high-end audio community. Like Dark Side, this is a defining record not only for the artist but for a genre of music. Have GFTO on SACD and the Yes 1968 - 1987 Studio Boxset on CD. DJM CD very excellent as is the MCA clone mastering of the DJM. This release was originally announced in late 2019 and fans have been waiting patiently ever since. I'm hoping that everyone who has voted actually owns both, and are not just excited about the 2016. Examples: AcousticSounds offers 1,614 titles on SACD and 28,670 on vinyl. Sep 23, 2022. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. SACD (white) vs Bluray (blue) The pressing quality of 2022 vinyl is not always perfect, but often a wash will solve the problem. But when I find an album that is available in SACD vs Vinyl----SACD 90% of the time, unless the LP is a collectors items and LTD edition. I'm getting older so no longer hear above 16kHz, so that means 320 kbps mp3 is pretty much transparent to me, as well as v0 vbr mp3. . I was still unconvinced. "No matter how high a sampling rate is," Wired's. However, we find a significant variation of the levels of the top of the spectrum (above 15 kHz) due to an equalization or to the burning head (red zone). Whereas some others where I am pretty familiar with it's vinyl 'equivalent' I could tell even without direct comparison that the vinyl was better, like Kind of Blue for example. The sound of the two versions is similar. 0:00 - LP2. The original purpose was a sonic comparison of MQA to SACD in the physical realm. The MoFi also has surface noise,while the Abkco vinyl is near silent. I like both; but am buying more hi-q vinyl than SACD, DVD-A, or HDCD simply because remastered 180g vinyl is easier to find in the genres I listen to: Rock, alt-rock, blues, some jazz, and oldies. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. With a storage capacity of 4. Updated on January 6, 2021 Although pre-recorded CDs have lost luster with the convenience of digital music streaming and downloads, the CD started the digital music. The SHM CD would have an edge over standard CD but would not surpass Vinyl and SACD, DVD-A if the pressing is mastered properly. The SACD just seemed too in my face and bright. SACD VS Vinyl for Jazz and Classical Well, I've been thinking of getting into vinyl for a while now but still haven't done it. all on Hybrid Multichannel SACD, in a special edition box set limited to 2,500 numbered copies! Also available as 45 RPM double LPs in a box set. Acoustic Sounds Audiophile Vinyl Records. Then I bought the new SACD version. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me. I'm generally rather selective about my SACD purchases and only have about 25-30SACD recordings now although I plan to order a lot more as more and more reissues come out. The SACD versions bring the best of the digital versions with the MOFI SACD followed by the 1999 SACD. If you're a big classical/jazz listener, SACD is completely worth it. 8224 MHz (64 times that of CD) Bit Depth: 1-bit (compared to CD’s 16-bit) Channels: Multi-channel (up to 6) and stereo Storage Capacity: Typically 4. Anyway, my sense is that good vinyl and good SACD are probably comparable but there are a lot of other variables such as quality of the music system etc. Headquartered in Salina, Kansas, Acoustic Sounds, Inc. The 2003 hybrid SACD and the MFSL feature the original mix, but they have inferior sound to the JWH tracks which appear on. It's rather disingenuous to claim 150 dB dynamic range for CD audio. Be fun to have that and play mastering engineer. The OP asked specifically if an SHM-Platinum CD sounds better than the redbook layer of a Hybrid-SACD. Search Head Gear. Steely Dan-Cant Buy A Thrill-Hybrid Stereo SACD|Acoustic Sounds. It lacks the deep bass of the Abkco pressing but sounds so much more "vivid" and real. While vinyl records, in theory, directly encode a smooth audio wave, CDs sample that audio wave at various points and then collate those samples. IMHO. Vinyl has more. The vinyl appears to be analogue mastered so if you value an all-analogue chain that would be an advantage. In fact, it's a good sign that the music isn't overly compressed. It was released on two formats: On vinyl record, as an Ultradisc ‘One-Step’ Limited Edition 33⅓ rpm LP, pressed on Neotech’s Super Vinyl™ contained in a commemorative slip box, (and), on CD, as a single Ultradisc 'UHR' Super Audio Compact Disc (SACD) contained in a gatefold card sleeve. e. After purchasing The Cars S/T, Candy-O, and Shake It Up on MFSL vinyl, here are my thoughts. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. . of the Dark Side of the Moon, is NOT good sonically. Label: Reprise: Genre: Pop/Rock: Product No. . According to a theorem called. label will be coming to hybrid stereo SACD (playable on all CD players) as well as to audiophile-standard UltraDisc One-Step 180-gram, 45 RPM vinyl. SACD sounds damn nice, there are LOTS of them available and new SACD's of material that interests me continue to be released. . Mastered: Doug Sax, James Guthrie, Joel Plante. sacd vs other formats IGNORED sacd vs other formats. If something has "Vinyl" in the title it's a needledrop. 98: Grateful Dead / Workingman's Dead Hybrid Stereo SACD Numbered Limited Edition CMOB 2137 SA Original Price: $29. I have a few titles on both vinyl, r2r, cd and SACD. . But don't have YesSongs on disc (have it on original vinyl only). disc duplication: The Indie Music Minute. It ain't dead to me at all, thanks in no small part to our host. Stax, SACD vs. g. But Sony is almost 4 times more. 15 on its list of the 20 Greatest Duos of All Time. Rolling Stone 500 Greatest Albums of All Time — rated 30/500! " Are You Experienced appeared in the U. Thread Status: Not open for further replies. I guess you have to love old music to appreciate DSD, since that's about all that's represented. Page 2 of 2 < Prev 1 2. Get either the target Morrison Hotel CD or the Audio Fidelity. SACD has less expensive equipment than vinyl and it requires a whole lot less fuss to run. 00 or less 23 vote(s) 13. 4) Making Movies - muted, no drum slam, muted highs. One example is excess Volume Compression in modern music. vinyl. Shawn, Dec 8, 2012. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. With a storage capacity of 4. Or sign in with one of these services. Look how far CD sound has come in the last 20. 00. It was mastered by Bob Ludwig in December 2002. I don’t care what they claim they did to the CD. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. Thread: SACD Vs. " CD or SACD vs Vinyl. The difference between 24/192 and DSD is that the DSD sounds more analog like, but this is not a huge difference in overall sound quality. I'm generally rather selective about my SACD purchases and only have about 25-30SACD recordings now although I plan to order a lot more as more and more reissues come out. Denon - DCD-A110 SACD/CD Player. Australia. DSD is also far more accurate where it counts, in the meaty. This is the reason why Pink Floyd did NOT consider Alan Parsons. Roxanne Joncas Soundstage determines the stereo image width you perceive between the speakers. if one uses the instruments attached to the sides of his head, he will be picking sacd over rbcd. SACD. The vocals are real, the acoustic guitars are EQ'd perfectly. I am not sure if it is a great. Quote: Originally Posted by FenderP To me, it's not about formats. Which format do you like the most, or find to be the closest to the original master tapes? Or, if you attend live concerts (or play and instrument), which format do you prefer and why? wenterprisesnw 02-04-2000 7:53pm. The MoFi vinyl is a real eye-opener. Given the same mastering, vinyl is still better than redbook. " CD or SACD vs Vinyl. The SHM CD would have an edge over standard CD but would not surpass Vinyl and SACD, DVD-A if the pressing is mastered properly. I prefer the SACD. There are also the hybrid SACD discs from AP but I am not as familiar with those. SACD vs. If it's a choice between vinyl and SACD in headphones, then most people with any sort of budget will almost certainly pick SACD. Edit; I forgot I have one. Vinyl is better than CD because it reproduces higher frequencies than CD and avoids anti-aliasing filter issues at the frequencies CDs can reproduce. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Note the word “indistinguishable. For vinyl I currently have the 2009 Classic 200g, I think mastered by Grundman. Dave Esoteric Audio Research Specialist. in May of 1967, one week before Sgt. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Vinyl: SACD offers digital precision, while vinyl provides analog warmth and character. It is overbright on SACD. DSD vs SACD vs Vinyl Whenever I look for an older album or artist, seemingly WITHOUT FAIL they are not available as a DSD download. Well I have the MFSL vinyl of Desire, and reckon it's pretty darn good. Hi all, Im searching for some way to test SACD compared to vinyl. If you want to try SACD on a budget (relatively), the Sony UBP-X800M2 Blu-Ray player plays SACDs (as well as DVD Audio, which does high-res surround). DJM first pressing vinyl from the UK best of all media. Mirror Image Forum Resident. I don’t care what they claim they did to the CD. The most notable proof of this is the CD4 quadraphonic system which relied on a 45 kHz bandwidth. Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by swinger, Mar 2, 2004. It may still engage me more, even if the SQ overall is not as pristine as an SACD. Bluebook The right price. I have plenty of other SACDs in my collection that. There is some technology that JVC uses to make the. Buy both. Im just wondering when? Menu. SteelyTom likes this. On the other hand, Vinyl records have a larger dynamic range than SACDs, which means that they can accurately reproduce louder and softer sounds. The real difference between various releases is the quality of the mastering. However, I think it's still too early to answer this question even with identically mastered sources recorded and played back on state-of-the-art equipment optimized for. Analog Format. I don't know which is more truthful. Both are also 4K UHD Blu-Ray players. SACD, to me, just doesn't sound real, life-like, or true. SACD Specifications. #4. Roland. You can remain judicious in selecting your choices. better stereo separation, etc. I noted underneath your review of the box set that the new SHM-SACD was a flat transfer from the analogue master. S. And it was a very close match with the vinyl barely winning the battle. They all sound good but the SACD is sublime. Newly remastered by Bernie Grundman, from the original analog master tapes! Includes both mono and stereo mixes — Pure DSD sound! *cd layer contains stereo mix only. Hi commsysman.